Back to top.
Violence Spreads in Thailand After Crackdown.

I received an email from a couple of Volunteer and Study Abroad programs this past week. The letter stated that all travel plans for Thailand have been canceled due to political unrest and violence in Bangkok. Although this piece of news does not have any direct link to women’s rights (that I could find anyway) I decided to do some research- and this is what I found.

BANGKOK — A bloody crackdown in Bangkok by the Thai military set off rioting and arson attacks on Wednesday in several places across Thailand, threatening to expand unrest and further aggravate the deep rifts that have hobbled Thai society for the past four years.

Troops and armored military vehicles overcame grenade-wielding militants allied with antigovernment protesters in Bangkok, forcing the movement’s leaders to turn themselves in to the police.

But even as the government declared victory in quashing a debilitating protest that had shut down parts of Bangkok for two months, the rampage across Bangkok and in at least three provinces in the country’s populous northeastern hinterland raised concerns about the conflict’s spreading and the future of the current government.

The government declared a curfew in 24 of the country’s 76 provinces, a radical move underlined by its announcement that looters or arsonists would be shot.

Arsonists in Bangkok set fire to almost 30 buildings, the government said, including the country’s stock exchange, a massive shopping mall, two banks, a movie theater and a television station. Two city halls were set on fire in the provincial capitals when thousands of protesters reacted to news of the Bangkok crackdown.

It was a measure of Thailand’s spiraling political violence that the death toll in the crackdown — about 12 people killed and more than 60 injured — was less than the bloodbath that many had feared.

Central Bangkok, the heart of one of Asia’s most cosmopolitan cities, was a militarized zone in the early hours of Thursday, with well-armed troops patrolling streets deserted by the curfew. The subway system remained shut, and embassies told their citizens living across this sprawling metropolis of about 15 million people to stay indoors.

On Thursday morning, more than 24 hours after the crackdown began, thousands of terrified protesters filed out of a Buddhist temple next to the gutted shopping mall after the police negotiated their departure. The bodies of six protesters killed in the clashes were lined up on the temple grounds.

The leaders of the red shirts, who had roared into Bangkok on March 12 demanding news elections and calling for what they said was true democracy for the country, surrendered to the police on Wednesday afternoon to face charges of terrorism.

Their arrests and the dispersal of the crowd were rare victories for the embattled government of Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva. But the volatile, defiant mood of the crowd on Wednesday also signaled a possible radicalization of a movement that leaders found difficult to control.

“We cannot resist against these savages anymore,” Jatuporn Prompan, one of the leaders, said on a stage inside the protest zone before turning himself in. He was booed by protesters who wanted to carry on.

“Please listen to me!” he pleaded to the crowd. “Brothers and sisters, I will use the word ‘beg.’ I beg you. We have to end this for now.” The call was not heeded, and protesters began setting nearby buildings ablaze.

On many days during the two months of protests, Mr. Jatuporn had worn a T-shirt with an image of Gandhi. But the resistance put up by some militants among the protesters was anything but nonviolent on Wednesday.

Soldiers assaulting the upscale neighborhood where protesters had been gathered were repelled with grenades. One soldier said militants were firing the weapons from the high floors of apartment buildings in the area.

The crackdown began Wednesday morning after weeks of negotiations failed to disperse protesters, many of whom are followers of Thaksin Shinawatra, the prime minister ousted in a 2006 military coup. Soldiers clashed with militants, some of whom were armed with assault weapons. As troops approached, anxiety spread through the protest zone, which was in one of the wealthiest neighborhoods in Bangkok and home to many corporate headquarters, high-end shopping malls, luxury hotels and high-rise apartment buildings.

Thai news outlets reported that one of the more militant protest leaders, Arisman Pongruengrong, who is also a popular singer, fled the protest zone in disguise. Mr. Arisman made headlines last month when he evaded arrest by climbing from a window as the police raided the hotel where he was staying. He was captured Wednesday evening by the police and taken to a military base outside Bangkok.

Around noon, seven protest leaders announced that they would turn themselves in.

But they left on an uncompromising note. Standing on a stage amid the chaos, just before giving up, one of the leaders, Nattawut Saikua, shouted: “If the prime minister wants to govern the country on the top of this wreckage, he should go ahead and kill us all. But if he wants to do the right thing, he should stop the shooting immediately.”

Soon afterward, the shooting intensified. Soldiers surged and retreated at the booming of grenades. Two protesters were killed, and several journalists were shot or wounded by shrapnel. An Italian news photographer was killed, according to Thai news media, and two foreign journalists and one Thai photographer were wounded.

One Western journalist was carried away on a stretcher from the chaotic protest area.

“Keep breathing! Keep breathing,” yelled a man running next to the journalist, who appeared critically wounded.

The soldiers stopped their advance, but protesters ran anyway, leaving behind a scattered trail of personal items: slippers, pots of boiling soup, laundry on clotheslines. They fled so suddenly that the large generators that had powered the sound system and lights for the round-the-clock speeches were still running.

Protesters set fire to Central World, one of the largest department stores in Southeast Asia. On Thursday morning the mall was a blackened, smoldering skeleton. Some people in the area carried boxes of cellphones and other electronics, presumably from the mall.

Looting was also reported in other parts of the city. Protesters attacked several news outlets, which they accused of bias, forcing one television station off the air.

The government has accused Mr. Thaksin, the former prime minister, of financing the protest movement, which began as a reaction to his removal in the 2006 coup, but developed into a broader social movement seeking greater income equality and reducing the role of the country’s powerful military in politics.

One protester who fled said she felt let down by the leaders of the movement. “Everyone feels that our leaders betrayed us,” said Wanpamas Boonpun, 39. “We want democracy. True democracy, free democracy. Why is it so hard, why?”

On television, the government sought to calm the situation, broadcasting a music video with images of Thai flags, rice paddies and the country’s king. “We have to love each other,” went the lyrics to the pop song. “We want to see Thais loving each other again, just like we used to.”

Information found here via New York Times.

Now, even after reading this it is still not clear to me why the people of Thailand are protesting. I researched further and came across a helpful site with clear answers to my question.

“Sunday’s fighting came after the Thai government rejected an offer of more talks with the Red Shirt protesters, who demand new elections. Instead, the government said the Red Shirts had until Monday afternoon to clear all women and children out of the protest site.”

“…They say the government is unelected and illegitimate, backed by the military, and only serves the elite. They want new elections now.”

Information found here.

05.20.10 0
Zoom Happy mothers day to all of you Amazing women out there! Isn’t this photo just to cute? =)


My cousin recently miscarried her first child, I thought this was beautiful and had to share what she wrote:

“I believe everybody is a Mom. Maybe you’ve never physically had a child, but you may have step-kids, pets, sick family, crazy friends who need TLC, plants, a significant other who needs mothering, or you’re a single dad who has to be everything for your children. So Happy Mother’s Day to everybody who has ever kissed away a boo-boo, hugged with all your heart and loved unconditionally.”

Happy mothers day to all of you Amazing women out there! Isn’t this photo just to cute? =)

My cousin recently miscarried her first child, I thought this was beautiful and had to share what she wrote:

“I believe everybody is a Mom. Maybe you’ve never physically had a child, but you may have step-kids, pets, sick family, crazy friends who need TLC, plants, a significant other who needs mothering, or you’re a single dad who has to be everything for your children. So Happy Mother’s Day to everybody who has ever kissed away a boo-boo, hugged with all your heart and loved unconditionally.”

05.09.10 0
Zoom life:

“A liberated woman is one who has sex before marriage and a job after.”
The Birth of the Pill

You would think women in developing countries would agree to a contraceptive option after learning how many health risks could be prevented, or at the very least have the risk of an unplanned pregnancy or sexually transmitted disease dramatically decreased. But because of cultural friction and poverty many opt out. They also must ask their husbands before agreeing to take the pill, or use condoms. Most men decline their wives the right to take this needed precaution. Again, there are many cultural reasons why it is considered unacceptable. Some women are labeled ‘whores’, very similar to the discrimination women endure when they are uncircumcised by the time they are married, or even in most cases, still children. Most tribes also believe in sorcery and bad omens, so this too is an issue that must be addressed through observation and learning techniques to work around cultural influences so that you are not disrupting the community and their heritage.

life:

“A liberated woman is one who has sex before marriage and a job after.”

The Birth of the Pill

You would think women in developing countries would agree to a contraceptive option after learning how many health risks could be prevented, or at the very least have the risk of an unplanned pregnancy or sexually transmitted disease dramatically decreased. But because of cultural friction and poverty many opt out. They also must ask their husbands before agreeing to take the pill, or use condoms. Most men decline their wives the right to take this needed precaution. Again, there are many cultural reasons why it is considered unacceptable. Some women are labeled ‘whores’, very similar to the discrimination women endure when they are uncircumcised by the time they are married, or even in most cases, still children. Most tribes also believe in sorcery and bad omens, so this too is an issue that must be addressed through observation and learning techniques to work around cultural influences so that you are not disrupting the community and their heritage.

05.08.10 8360
The question isn’t who’s going to let me; it’s who is going to stop me.

— Ayn Rand

05.08.10 0
Zoom She is so young, the pain behind her expression is heart wrenching. I dont know her circumstances or why her angelic features are distrait and emotional, but to say that she and her family will have hard times ahead of them is not far fetched. Thats to say however, that they haven’t already begun. I know you will all agree, that there is no child in the World that deserves such worries. I will see to it that my life’s work is dedicated to the women and children in need, whether it be in foreign countries, or in my own back yard.
Direct link here, Via Social Geographics Flickr Photostream.

She is so young, the pain behind her expression is heart wrenching. I dont know her circumstances or why her angelic features are distrait and emotional, but to say that she and her family will have hard times ahead of them is not far fetched. Thats to say however, that they haven’t already begun. I know you will all agree, that there is no child in the World that deserves such worries. I will see to it that my life’s work is dedicated to the women and children in need, whether it be in foreign countries, or in my own back yard.

Direct link here, Via Social Geographics Flickr Photostream.

05.08.10 0
Mandatory Military Service in Foreign Countries.

I recently met a foreign women working at a Las Vegas mall called Miracle Mile connected to the Planet Hollywood resort. Her cart was located towards the middle of the establishment, centered in a large ally way. To her left was another cart, where a couple of women (also from other countries) were calling after passers to buy their amazing fast and easy nail polish applicators. And to her right, two women (also foreign) were applying their sales pitch to a couple of women they lured in, promising a great deal for a versatile dress.

She is a beautiful women, in her 20’s (I honestly couldn’t tell how old, her skin was just amazing!) selling organic skin care products in Las Vegas, Nevada. My sister, mother and I were there a good hour listening to her pitch and testing out the ‘your skin will look amazing!’ products. As my mother haggled for a better price the women jokingly asked if we were Jewish. “No, were not.” my mom replied, “Why?” She smiled and said “Well I am Jewish, and you know what they say about Jewish women. We are business people by heart, always looking for the best deal.” She laughed. We started talking about her mothers skin care regime, which in turn led to why she was in Vegas. “I am a Soldier from Israel*,” she said “when I was let out after 2 years of service, from 18 to 20 my family and I moved out here for a better life. My brother has been in the Israel Army for three years, we hope that he will make the move too.”

By looking at her, you would have never guessed she was a soldier, drafted at the age of 18. I had read about men in South Korea drafted when they turned 18 for 21 months but I didn’t realise that Israel too had this same rule— a way of life, and that women were also drafted. Which to be honest I am torn on. For the longest time in the US women were prohibited to join the Armed Forces, I am proud that we to can now make the decision to join if we chose to do so. So in a way I am glad that women in Israel are allowed to join, however I am still against drafting citizens against their will. This new information prompted my search for more information on mandatory military service in foreign countries, and their status on drafting. I was shocked to find that there are many countries with Mandatory Military service…

*Israel has mandatory military service for both men and women. All Israeli citizens are conscripted at age 18 or the conclusion of 12th Grade, with the following exceptions:

  • Haredim are eligible for a deferral during their religious studies, which essentially becomes an exemption.
  • Israeli Arabs are exempt from conscription, although they may volunteer. The men of other non-Jewish communities in Israel, notably the Druze, Bedouin, and Circassians, are conscripted; women are not though may volunteer.
  • Religiously observant Jewish women can apply for an exemption from army service. Although some choose to serve, many opt to serve voluntarily in civilian “national service” Sherut Leumi.
  • Women are not inducted if they are married or pregnant.
  • Candidates who do not qualify on grounds of mental or physical health.

Typically, men are required to serve for 3 years and women for 2 years. Officers and other soldiers in certain voluntary units such as Nahal and Hesder are required to sign on for additional service. Those studying in a “Mechina” (pre-induction preparatory course) defer service until the conclusion of the program, typically one academic year. An additional program (called “Atuda’i”) for qualified applicants allows post-secondary academic studies prior to induction. See also: Israel Defence Forces.

There is a very limited amount of conscientious objection to conscription into the IDF. More common is refusal by reserve soldiers to serve in the West Bank and Gaza. Some of these conscientious objectors may be assigned to serve elsewhere, or are sentenced to brief prison terms lasting a few months to a year and may subsequently receive dishonourable discharges. See also: Refusal to serve in the Israeli military.

After a year their period of regular army service, men are liable for up to 30 days (much less on average) per year of reserve duty (miluim) until they are in their early forties. Women in certain positions of responsibility are liable for reserve duty to a limited extent, until they are twenty-four years old, married, or pregnant.

Information found here.

05.07.10 0
Health News:

Integrating Reproductive Health and HIV Services Advances Gender Equity and Human Rights

Integrating family planning and reproductive health and HIV services is an important strategy to reduce new HIV infections and unintended pregnancies and promote gender equality and human rights. Integrating family planning/reproductive health and HIV services will broaden the reach of both, essential at a time when, despite a massive increase in resources devoted to fighting HIV/AIDS, only a negligible reduction in new HIV infections has been achieved.1 Furthermore, more than 200 million women have an unmet need for contraception to prevent an unintended pregnancy.2  Because more than 80 percent of new HIV infections are sexually transmitted and women are vulnerable to both HIV infections and unintended pregnancies, addressing these two problems simultaneously is more necessary now than ever before.

Counteracting Gender Inequality and Stigma

UNAIDS has identified gender inequality and stigma against AIDS as the leading factors contributing to HIV risk.3 The fear of stigma and discrimination impedes socially marginalized people and adolescents from accessing HIV prevention, care, and treatment. Illiterate, socially restricted women and girls have severely limited opportunities to learn how to protect themselves. Integrating services responds to their strategic gender needs, promoting greater equality with men in their use of time and access to information.4 In many societies, including the United States, women have less unscheduled time; and girls have less leisure time than boys.5 If individuals—mothers, working adults, in-school and out-of-school youth—are able to address two or more health issues in a single visit to a health center, they save time and travel expense and do not forfeit other opportunities. It is not surprising therefore that the ability of clients to do “one-stop shopping” has resulted in improved health outcomes. Benefits also accrue to the economic sector and to households when girls and women are able to spend their time earning income, studying, caring for their children and families, or participating in community life.

Integration also helps reduce the stigma associated with free-standing clinics that treat HIV and sexually transmitted infections. When women (and men) can take advantage of provider-initiated testing and counseling as part of routine care, more people will be aware of their HIV status. Coupled with the savings that integration can mean for scare health system resources, linking services is a win-win situation. Yet, more than a decade after integration of HIV and reproductive health services was proposed, widespread integration remain an unrealized goal.6

Knowledge Fundamental to Women’s Empowerment

Quality services for family planning or HIV prevention, care, and treatment empower sexually active individuals to make safe and responsible decisions about their intimate lives. Women are empowered with lifesaving information when HIV prevention is discussed in the context of maternal health and family planning services, and the availability of family planning information and contraceptives within HIV services settings allows a woman to exercise her rights to plan and space her births, to conceive more safely if she chooses to become pregnant, and to negotiate safer sex with a partner. 

Clients’ Need for Comprehensive Services

Clients who seek HIV and reproductive health services share similar needs and concerns. Tens of millions of women want to delay their next pregnancy for at least two years or stop having children altogether, but for a variety of reasons, are not using a modern method of contraception. Women with an unmet need for contraception also need information on how to avoid contracting HIV. Women represent nearly half of the 33 million people living with HIV, and several studies suggest that a majority of them also have an unmet need for family planning.7 Because of the dual burden of high unmet need for contraception and high regional prevalence of HIV, women in sub-Saharan Africa have the greatest risk of unintended pregnancy and HIV. While many of these women may wish to have a child at some point, studies in Côte d’Ivoire, South Africa, and Uganda have found that more than half of HIV-positive respondents had an unintended pregnancy.8 Integration gives providers an opportunity to educate clients about the strategies for preventing HIV, sexually transmitted infections, and unintended pregnancies.

Preventing Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV

Nearly all of the 370,000 new HIV infections that occurred among infants and children in 2007 were preventable.9 The risk of transmitting HIV from mother to child during birth or through breastfeeding can be greatly reduced through providing antiretroviral treatment, but services to prevent mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV currently reach only a third of HIV-positive expectant mothers. Clearly, it is in the interests of parents, children, and societies to prevent new infections by ensuring universal access to PMTCT services. Many women fail to be tested or to accept treatment because they fear they will be discriminated against or abandoned if identified as HIV-positive. Access could be greatly expanded through integration of PMTCT services with existing maternal and reproductive care.

Safer Pregnancies for Women With HIV

Many HIV-positive women hope to safely conceive a child at a future time. In Ghana, researchers found that 56 percent of women with HIV wanted to have a child in the future, and 22 percent wanted a child within the next two years.10 HIV-positive women who desire a pregnancy can conceive more safely if the severity of their infection is reduced through antiretroviral therapy prior to conception. Providers of integrated services can help by starting them on this therapy prior to conception and encouraging consistent condom use until their level of infection (viral load) is as low as possible.11 Many women are in a relationship where one partner is not infected. When pregnancy is desired, couples also need counseling on low-cost strategies to help them conceive safely while minimizing the risk for the uninfected partner.12 In addition, women who have recently given birth need family planning services to prevent a subsequent birth that is too closely spaced. Most PMTCT services do not include family planning counseling or referral, but making this information and referral universally available in HIV counseling, testing, and PMTCT treatment centers is a route to better health for women and infants.

Gender Equity and Human Rights

Integrated programs providing a variety of services offer a greater potential of reaching underserved or vulnerable groups, particularly youth, who now represent 45 percent of all those newly infected with HIV. Young women are three times as likely as young men of the same age to become infected.13 They are especially in need of information and services they can access with confidence that their personal information will be kept confidential and that providers will treat them with respect.14

Integration enhances gender equity and fosters human rights—another important rationale for moving forward with the rollout of high-quality, convenient, one-stop comprehensive health care services. When policymakers, program staff, and other key stakeholders, including people living with HIV, work together to advance the field of reproductive health and HIV/AIDS integration, millions, particularly women and girls, will benefit.

Note: Posted 101 days ago.

Information found here.

05.02.10 0
Education News:

Effective Implementation of Proven Practices for Children in Real World Clinical, Educational, and Community Settings.

For over 35 years, Dr. Sharon Ramey has studied early childhood development and how to implement scientific research in policy. On Feb. 11, she participated in PRB’s Policy Seminar series to discuss how to take what is known to work for early childhood development and bring science to bear to design effective policy. According to Ramey, the failures of programs for young children are not due to a lack of funding but rather, to misplaced priorities.

Dr. Ramey is the founding director (along with Dr. Craig Ramey) of the Georgetown University Center on Health and Education and is the Susan H. Mayer Professor in Child and Family Studies. Dr. Ramey’s research has focused on the effects of the environment on behavior, including longitudinal studies of the effects of early experience on children “at risk” for school failure; pioneering work on prenatal care and pregnancy outcomes; studies on the dynamic changes affecting American families; observational research on the social ecology of residential and educational settings; a landmark study of the transition to school for 11,000 children from kindergarten through third grade; and a series of ongoing multisite studies to prevent child neglect. Drs. Craig and Sharon Ramey currently have launched a large-scale program of randomized clinical trials that test the efficacy of professional development programs designed to promote teaching excellence and raise student achievement. 

Sharon Ramey spoke with PRB before the policy seminar.

What are the basics of care and support that all young children need to thrive?

Children simultaneously need four areas addressed: Health and safety…Daily stimulation of language and basic cognitive function, what we call language and learning…They also need to have responsive care that gets adapted for their age and individuality that will promote social and emotional growth and development. The fourth and final, and it’s becoming more complex to meet this, is that the family…needs to really be in productive, effective partnerships with all the other people touching that child’s life on a regular basis. The health care providers and the teachers need to be working collectively with the family. In a world where the demography is changing, there’s lot of mobility, and people don’t even have a common language sometimes, much less common values…that communication can be a very big deal.

Can you describe some of the major challenges confronting American families in terms of early child care and support?

American families as a whole actually still continue to be well-off. But what we have are three big at-risk groups of children. We have a subgroup of children living in poverty whose own families are so challenged and did not have good health and educational supports that they have difficulty meeting their children’s needs. It’s not all people in poverty, it’s a subgroup that is really challenged to give their children what they need to thrive. And their communities have been marginalized and have excessive challenges and are under-resourced. Another (at-risk group) are children with disabilities for whom we know how to give an effective intervention but very often what they’re given is a dose that is below a threshold to help them. So a child who gets two hours of therapy a week, but needs 20…is at great risk of having secondary lifelong problems and disabilities that are totally preventable if they get what they need early on.

A third group…are academically and artistically gifted children. We are antielitist in this country and we know we need these people, we know they are our future. But we somehow don’t know if we should spend any public time or energy to help them since they’re “ahead of the game.” Well that’s not true. Many of the young, exceptionally talented children really don’t fit in and have a lot of secondary emotional and social problems and some do withdraw and some just get overlooked and never deliver on their natural inclinations. Especially if they’re poor and talented, they’re going to get overlooked and that’s a real loss of human capital.

A fourth group are the children who have problems that emerge that are probably going to be temporary and time-bound—a period of illness or a period where a learning difference becomes a disability in a school that expects you to be highly organized and you don’t look like you’re highly organized, but you’re really quite intelligent. So these are children who don’t have a major disability, they’re not extremely poor…but they have differences that could place them in jeopardy. If those differences aren’t understood and responded to well, those kids can go off trajectory and they’re kids who will be much more likely to take undue risk when they become adolescents, kids who detach, and don’t connect and have feelings for other people. These are not pathological kids. But the way we sometimes ignore or abuse these kids by having lockstep systems can be tragic. It’s not a large number of children, but it’s still too many who fall into this temporary category.

What are the demographic impacts on family care and young children in the United States? How do income, racial, or regional differences affect the resources and abilities of families?

What I see is that the demography, the social variables like your ethnicity, language, family income, and size—these all are markers for more interactional, proximal variables. But they’re crude markers so we always have exceptions. So within the extremely poor in this country, there are some children who thrive and among the extremely educated and well-to-do, there are children suffering badly. As a developmental scientist, I’m often interested in why there isn’t a direct match between the demography. Demography helps us identify places to concentrate either research or resources to maximize what we can learn…but we need to move beyond that. Some of my work has looked at what’s called the typology of poverty. We have found six major subgroups of families based on a combination of the educational and income resources, the interactions people have with their children, and their ability to relate to societal institutions.

Can you discuss your work on the effects of the family and larger community environment on behavior, including how family and community environment affects school readiness and achievement?

It is very sad that we’ve gotten into a blaming game. Teachers blame parents, parents blame teachers…a young child doesn’t know actually who’s my real parent vs. who’s someone paid to take care of me. So for a young child, there’s a functional family of people who love and care for the child so that’s one way to think about family. And then of course there’s the…everyday, which isn’t always the legal family…For me as a social scientist, family has many definitions. In the conventional sense, we have a lot of parents right now who are challenged if they happen to be a teen and not in charge of his or her own household and trying to finish his or her education. A teen parent presents a high risk for neglect in the first five years of life. If the parent is a former special ed. student who doesn’t get good transition-to-adulthood support, that parent may not be able to negotiate the educational, social, and health systems very well…Then there are families living in extremely chaotic residential situations where the stability of their housing, income, and food security and the relationships in their immediate environment are threatened…and make it almost impossible to protect the parents and family unit at the same time they nurture every child. So the demands swamp the family system.

There is so much research on what young children need, what a supporting and caring environment consists of, and the economic benefits of providing that to children. Yet implementing that in policy and translating research for policymakers is a challenge. How can we bridge the gap between early childhood development research and policy?

I think this is the most important, because if we know that much and we’re not putting it into action, to me, it’s almost a public responsibility. Our research is funded publicly, we owe it back to make sure it can be understood and interpreted in terms of policy. One of the challenges is that policies often want to find something that’s structural and easy. We like to say “Oh—child care giving will have certain ratios and we’ll make sure everyone has a certain level of education or a certain number of in-service training hours.” And then you think, “Phew—that’s high quality!” Here’s the dilemma: those structural supports that often become our policies have not yet been sufficient to guarantee that children get the daily experiences or interactions. We need to have our policies get closer to what really matters for children…We need more of our scientists to get help about communicating and working in partnership with policymakers and practitioners and we need to be sure that policymakers get more science background so they can collaborate.

So do you think policy tends to have a narrow focus?

I work a lot with people who shape and determine policy and often they take exception, (saying) “Well we just have to make it simple.” But I say, “How do you know you have to make it simple? That’s the way you’ve been doing it but how about we put forward a policy where in general you do this, but if you can’t meet these ratios—if you’re in a rural area, the ratios for staff to children or the educational levels aren’t feasible—you offer alternative routes.” You offer solutions that people don’t have to request a waver for. If they can prove they can deliver what’s needed for a child through a different route, you’ll accept it. We could make policies that have flexibility not in terms of guaranteeing children get important things, but in how you get there. So I think we need to have more flexibility and more experimentation when we implement programs to benefit children.

Note: Posted 100 days ago.

Information found here.

05.02.10 0
Zoom 
Empowering Women Economically 
“Women’s rights are vitally important not just for improving the position of women but for the health, strength and prosperity of their communities and societies. Everyone gains if the barriers holding women back are removed. And that’s particularly true if women get the chance to fulfil their talents and ambitions economically.
It’s not just the extra income that this generates for women and their families. Greater economic security and independence gives women more control over their lives and a more influential voice in their communities. And no society can thrive fully by writing off the talents of half their population.
It’s why helping women to make the most of their economic potential is vital in tackling global poverty and inequality. It’s something already recognised by some powerful global institutions who are working hard to give women the opportunity to thrive.” Cherie Blair 
Information found here.

Empowering Women Economically 


“Women’s rights are vitally important not just for improving the position of women but for the health, strength and prosperity of their communities and societies. Everyone gains if the barriers holding women back are removed. And that’s particularly true if women get the chance to fulfil their talents and ambitions economically.

It’s not just the extra income that this generates for women and their families. Greater economic security and independence gives women more control over their lives and a more influential voice in their communities. And no society can thrive fully by writing off the talents of half their population.

It’s why helping women to make the most of their economic potential is vital in tackling global poverty and inequality. It’s something already recognised by some powerful global institutions who are working hard to give women the opportunity to thrive.” Cherie Blair


Information found here.

05.01.10 0
Women have to harness their power - it’s absolutely true. It’s just learning not to take the first no. And if you can’t go straight ahead, you go around the corner.

— Cher

05.01.10 0